[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [datacenter] Flywheel ups



I've only had one personal experience with a flywheel UPS, and while I'd
argue with Frank that a flywheel failure is more spectacular than a
battery failure (exploding batteries vs. airborne flywheel...well, let's
say "spectactular" in different ways :-), Deepak is right - the cost of
maintenance is huge on a flywheel system. Plus, if your target is
consistent steady-state costs, you can buy maintenance contracts for
either system that will achieve that goal.

..j..

============================================================
Jay Yu
Invisible IT, Inc.
heyyu at invisibleit dot com                 +1 650 605 6464
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, 02 December, 2005 14:04
> To: Howard Marks
> Cc: Krzysztof Adamski; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [datacenter] Flywheel ups
> 
> 
> That said, you probably don't need 10 minutes of ride through either..
> 
> When a generator doesn't kick on, it takes facilities guys at 
> least 30 minutes to have the >courage< to start flipping 
> breakers when you are dealing with a 2MW monster (or 
> several). I suspect with a 1000 sq ft data center, it'll 
> still take at least 10 minutes to start flipping switches.
> 
> :)
> 
> DJ
> 
> Howard Marks wrote:
> > Also you say you need 10 MIN of ride through.  Powerware's flywheel 
> > system has 120 SEC (2MIN) of ride through and an MG set 
> isn't going to 
> > give you 5 times the ride through if you have 1/5th the 
> load like a UPS.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:32 PM
> > To: Krzysztof Adamski
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [datacenter] Flywheel ups
> > 
> > You probably also realize that the maintenance 
> (lubrication, bearings,
> > etc) on a flywheel easily exceed the amount of maintenance 
> on a sealed 
> > battery system.
> > 
> > The difference (mainly) is that you have relatively uniform 
> > maintenance costs instead of the jagged-saw tooth (with battery 
> > replacement) that UPS systems have.
> > 
> > Deepak Jain
> > AiNET
> > 
> > Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> > 
> >>I'm starting to design a new 1000sqf datacenter in a 
> building that has 
> >>reliable generator backup. So I will only need about 10-15 
> mins of UPS 
> >>power (if the generator won't start in that time, it won't 
> start for a 
> >>long time :-). I will only need AC power.
> >>
> >>I was wondering what peoples opinion was of the flywheel type UPS?
> >>The plus I see is that there is no battery bank to worry about.
> >>
> >>K
> >>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For 
> >>additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For 
> > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For 
> > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]