more tunnels and what to do next (fwd)

[brian@dxcoms.cern.ch (Brian Carpenter CERN-CN)]

Allison,
> 
> > Flat routing with RIPng should suffice for hundreds of routes; beyond that,
> > we clearly need hierarchical routing, but that should probably also
> > coincide with moving to "real" addresses, rather than the test addresses.
> > 
> > 
> Those quotes around real are very poignant. 
> Can we later this year have an interim draft 
> for aggregatable addresses?

Huh?
 draft-ietf-ipngwg-unicast-addr-fmt-04.txt

> I would like to see it be
> geographic addressing without all the details resolved:  

If you have a solution for geographic addressing that works,
unlike all previous attempts, pls write it up.

  Brian