[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
stla registry db issue
- Subject: stla registry db issue
- From: [email protected] (Perry E. Metzger)
- Date: 25 Dec 1999 14:26:59 -0500
- In-reply-to: "Michael H. Lambert"'s message of "Fri, 24 Dec 1999 09:31:17 -0500 (EST)"
- References: <[email protected]>
"Michael H. Lambert" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Bill Manning wrote:
> >
> > Er, that is pretty much exactly the point I was trying to make.
> > If Brian is right and that group is successful in restricting
> > announcements to /29's, how much space is wasted for the sixty
> > nodes that form the cluster "www.bigco.com" that has connections
> > to 20 major ISPs?
>
> But is "bigco.com" a transit IPv6 provider? My understanding is that if
> it isn't, it should never be allocated its own TLA. It should receive a
> small block from each of its ISPs. Or am I missing something?
Anyone out there who thinks they can actually prevent GM or Yahoo or
the like from getting their own routes announced should talk to an
anti-trust lawyer.
Perry