[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Question about the future
- Subject: Question about the future
- From: [email protected] (Matej Sustic)
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:34:44 -0700
No, he mislead nobody. The misunderstanding came from poor READING of his
message (I've misread it as well, but went back and I am willing to admit MY
mistake).
Just my $0.02
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bunclark [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 2:05 AM
To: Aaron Angel
Cc: Latif LADID; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question about the future
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Aaron Angel wrote:
> For the 'record', I'd like to point out he mislead no one. He stated
> quite
> clearly in the first sentect he was a director of delevelopment for one of
> the TCP/IP stacks for IBM mainframes; he did not say he was directly from
> IBM.
>
> --
> Aaron Angel <[email protected]>
On the contrary, he mislead many of us by very poor use of language. The
most misleading part was, he should have asked IBM first before this
mailing list; the wording implied very strongly, and now we know
incorrectly, that IBM weren't yet developing IPv6. And I think we might
be forgiven for assuming that the `director of development for one of the
TCP/IP stacks for IBM mainframes' probably did work for IBM.
Peter.