[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
About address allocating
- Subject: About address allocating
- From: [email protected] (Francis Dupont)
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:11:01 +0200
- In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 18 May 2000 21:53:37 +0800. <[email protected]>
In your previous mail you wrote:
hi, I have the following questions about address allocating:
I know SLA is /48, and interface ID should be 64 bits,
does it mean that the smallest unit when allocating address is /48?
In other words, if I allocate a /48 to a large university, could I
allocate a /48 to four middle schools, thus each middle school gets
an block less than /48, which is /50. Is this plan reasonable?
=> we'd like to get a /48, ISPs would like to give a /64 to us:
- /48 seems a bit too large for a default allocation size
- /64 is unusable when you need subneting
then the current idea, as presented yesterday here in Budapest
at the RIPE meeting, is to introduce "small site" which get
/56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
a few levels of hierarchy).
Then /56 will become the default allocation size in RIR
allocation & assignment document.
Regards
[email protected]