[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002

Subject: pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
From: [email protected] (Rik van Riel)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 19:00:31 -0200 (BRST)
In-reply-to: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B046405DDE7@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Michel Py wrote:

> >> From: Brig, Michael P. [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> I think Microsoft should be allowed it's pTLA. If we allow Cisco
> >> and Compaq then why not Microsoft? We should encourage greater
> >> participation verses building barriers.
>
> I agree. Besides, If we don't allow Microsoft to get a pTLA they will
> probably find another way that will be worse for everyone.

Despite my earlier criticism about 2003:/16 being announced,
I have to say I agree with this point of view.

Rik
-- 
DMCA, SSSCA, W3C?  Who cares?  http://thefreeworld.net/

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

Follow-Ups:
- pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
  - From: [email protected] (Gregg C Levine)

References:
- pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
  - From: [email protected] (Michel Py)

Prev by Date: pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002m
Next by Date: pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
Previous by thread: pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
Next by thread: pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread