[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ip6.arpa
- Subject: ip6.arpa
- From: [email protected] (Bill Manning)
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 07:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0105031217070.3267-100000@cass18> from "Peter Bunclark" at May 03, 2001 12:22:29 PM
%
% On Thu, 3 May 2001, Bill Manning wrote:
%
% > not yet. still using ip6.int.
% >
% One senses an undercurrent of politics. The docs glowingly state how
% ip6.int is the way forward (eg in the ARM doc: ``While the use of
% nibble format to look up names is deprecated, it is supported for
% backwards compatiblity with existing IPv6 applications''), but there's no
% sign of it actually happening.
%
% Bit of a conflict there if the only method in service is deprecated.
%
% Pete.
%
No!!! not politics!
Someone wrote a draft that became an RFC that stated: "the previous method
is depricated by this one", hence the statements in ARM et.al. Of course
there was the minor oversight in dealing w/ the:
) the deployed based
) lack of tools to effectivly use the new format
Hum....
(note that two years after CIDR effectivly squashed RIPv1, the IETF
published a document formally depricating RIPv1. And it still has
broad use.) I guess the lesson here is that just 'cause someone says
something doen't make it so.
--
--bill