[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ip6.arpa



> > 	The move has no technological basis. The RR type that
> > 	suggested the migration is itself under review. Why
> > 	the rush?

It was not any RR type that suggested the migration from ip6.int to
ip6.arpa, Bill.  Were you under some other impression?