[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[6bone] pTLA request by Euro6IX project forexchangeexperimentation - review closes 3 Sep 2002

Hi,

Yes, this is one of the points that we consider. In our project, new business models will be developed, including new services in
the IX. Of course, as you say, we see a model where the IX network can purchase/sell upstream, and this is not accepted by all the
project partners, because the commercial implications.

I believe the new services that can be offered, will compensate it, commercially speaking.

But fortunately in the project the commercial issues are apart.

Regards,
Jordi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arien Vijn" <[email protected]>
To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [6bone] pTLA request by Euro6IX project forexchangeexperimentation - review closes 3 Sep 2002


> Hi Jordi,
>
> On 13-08-2002 17:11PM, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >
> > More or less, but with the main difference that Euro6IX is not a single IX,
> > but a network of IX's.
>
> Apart from the R&D and IPv6 aspects. What is the difference between Euro6IX
> and a carrier?
>
> Exchange-based aggregation as described in RFC2374 does not work unless the
> IXP provides (buys) upstream for all it's members. Which might not be
> acceptable for many upstream providers. They might (will, I think) see this
> as competition. Did you consider the competition aspects?
>
> Kind regards, Arien
>
>
> --
>
> Arien Vijn
> Amsterdam Internet Exchange
> http://www.ams-ix.net
>


***********************************************************
Madrid 2002 Global IPv6 Summit
See all the documents on line at:
www.ipv6-es.com