[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[6bone] Re: routing concern
- Subject: [6bone] Re: routing concern
- From: [email protected] (Andy Furnell)
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:36:25 +0100
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207301605480.8815-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0207301327040.21584-100000@iscserv1> <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207301605480.8815-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 04:08:04PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Robert J. Rockell wrote:
>
> > While I take full responsibility for this, this is a good learning
> > experience. If you saw this bad route, you were not filtering correctly
> > (as sprint was not).
>
> It would be good to have the currently recommended
> filter rules published on the web somewhere.
>
> While seeing a message go by on the 6bone list that
> a new can of prefixes has been opened is nice, but
> people can be away from their computer for a week
> and decide not to check all of their email backlog.
>
> Of course, it's likely somebody has already thought
> of this and I just don't know where the prefix filter
> rules are published.
>
> In that case, where could I find the "official" list ? ;)
>
> cheers,
>
> Rik
Or at least something to build filters from. icbw but there doesn't seem
to be sufficient administrative architecture in place to build ingress
filters properly. Some kind of radb-style RPSL route objects might not
go amiss?
A
--
Andy Furnell
[email protected]