[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[6bone] semi-newbie Q on IPv6 address planning
- Subject: [6bone] semi-newbie Q on IPv6 address planning
- From: [email protected] (Joao Luis Silva Damas)
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:56:27 +0200
- In-reply-to: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B046405E22B@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.c a.us>
- References: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B046405E22B@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.c a.us>
At 8:00 -0700 31/7/02, Michel Py wrote:
>Nick,
>
>> Do we have to stick to allocating in lots of 8 bits?
>No. Same is v4, any bit boundary is valid.
>
>> Is a /44 allocation valid?
>Absolutely. In your case, you could use any prefix you want between /33
>and /48. The prefixes from /48 to /64 are the customer's responsibility,
>not yours (except for your infrastructure).
>
>> And what is a /126 allocation for a point-to-point link?
>
>Not good, it violates RFC2373.
Why?
> You should use a /64 for point-to-point
>links.
Why?
> It is typical to allocate a /48 for your ptp links.
It is convenient, yes.
Joao