[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
on avoiding renumbering (was Re: new 6bone pTLA prefix proposal, comments by 4 March 2002 please)
- Subject: on avoiding renumbering (was Re: new 6bone pTLA prefix proposal, comments by 4 March 2002 please)
- From: [email protected] (Nick Sayer)
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 05:03:14 -0800
- References: <01c1b8dc$8febdd80$181e9a1a@dhcp-248-101>
It seems to me that the biggest use for configured IP addresses is in
resolv.conf files (or platform equivalent), or at least for services
that can be characterized as local in nature.
And if it's local in nature, then why on *earth* are people not using
site-local addressing for that sort of thing, pray tell? *Especially*
for resolv.conf files (there is even an IETF draft suggesting that
fec0:0:0:ffff::{1,2,3} be considered defaults for resolving servers in
the absense of configured ones).
If we don't regard the prospect of renumbering networks to be *routine*,
we're going to end up in the same nasty mess that IPv4 is in today with
regards to the size of the non-default routing table.