[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[6bone] proposal for transfer of 6bone address management responsibilities to RIRs

Dear Christian,

Sorry I miss this one before.

I mean IPv6 is freedom (not free addresses), in the sense that you can have it and do anything you want (applications, services),
while in IPv4, we have limitations because 32 bits aren't enough for all kind of devices, people, ..., of course, considering the
end-to-end model (no NATs !).

I agree that address do not belong to anyone, and are "always" allocated temporarily, but for an indefinite period of time.

Too much philosophical, may be ;-)

Regards,
Jordi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian de Larrinaga" <[email protected]>
To: "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>; "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [6bone] proposal for transfer of 6bone address management responsibilities to RIRs


> Jordi
>
> >
> > Right now, it's important to push IPv6, but in the long run, I *want*
> > restrictions on "who can get IPv6 blocks from the RIR".
> >
> > > I always say IPv6 is FREEDOM, and following the same rule as in IPv4,
> > > it WILL NOT BE.
>
>
> If IPv6 addresses are "free" in the sense you describe how do they get re
> allocated when say a device dies or a home user moves on?
>
>
> Christian de Larrinaga
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6bone mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone
>


***********************************************************
Madrid 2002 Global IPv6 Summit
See all the documents on line at:
www.ipv6-es.com