[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[6bone] Re: 6bone Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13

Dear Sir
 
My project is perforamnce measure of various transition mechanism from IPv4 to IPv6. I have used latency,throughput and packet loss as measuring elements.
 
Please tell me how to calculate throughput? equation?

Thanking U
 
Mamtha
[email protected] wrote:
Send 6bone mailing list submissions to
[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of 6bone digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Re: reverse 6dns painful (Paul Jakma)
2. Re: Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless) (Matthew Luckie)
3. Re: Re: reverse 6dns painful (Gert Doering)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:13:26 +0000 (GMT)
From: Paul Jakma 

Subject: Re: [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful
To: Michael Kjorling 
Cc: 6bone <[email protected]>
Message-ID: 

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Michael Kjorling wrote:

> Just my 2/100 of a currency unit of your choice.

+5 informative, ta muchely.

Now, how do we get the BIND utilities to stop using the bitstring
format for reverse queries?

(and get everyone to agree on ip6.int).

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma [email protected] [email protected] Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to [email protected]
Fortune:
Nothing increases your golf score like witnesses.


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:42:23 +1300
From: Matthew Luckie 
Subject: Re: [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
To: Peter Bunclark 

Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

> Not bad,but still different from forward adresses; how much simpler (=
> easy, less prone to error, -> cheaper to administer) to use the same
> notation for forward and reverse.

just a small note on errors that I've seen in the reverses for names as 
part of a DNS walk I did of ip6.arpa about 9 months ago.

I attempted zone transfers from 2539 zones seen in ip6.arpa, and got 410 
transfers.

22 zones out of those 410 had addresses in them that appeared to have 
syntax errors, i.e. addresses were too short to be valid IPv6, or had 
incorrect characters, e.g.:

too long:

0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2

too short:

2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2

.0.0.0.0.0.0.x.x.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2

not 4-bit between dots

97.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2

2000.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2

separately to these 22 zones, I found examples of PTR and NS records 
that did not belong in the zone they were retrieved from.

e.g.

zone: x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa
1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.0.0.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2.ip6.int
(is that actually correct, the address is valid but supposed to be in 
ip6.arpa and not ip6.int?)

zone 4.0.0.0.x.x.x.x.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa
5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.9.0.0.0.y.y.y.y.e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa
(that one is bizarre, x.x.x.x is completely different to y.y.y.y)

Other than that, the state of reverses seemed to be in reasonable shape.

If you have any comments or questions or corrections, feel free to send 
them.

Matthew



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:44:21 +0100
From: Gert Doering 
Subject: Re: [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful
To: Paul Jakma 

Cc: Michael Kjorling , 6bone <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:13:26AM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Michael Kjorling wrote:
> 
> > Just my 2/100 of a currency unit of your choice.
> 
> +5 informative, ta muchely.
> 
> Now, how do we get the BIND utilities to stop using the bitstring
> format for reverse queries?

Upgrade?

> (and get everyone to agree on ip6.int).

Make that "arpa", please :-)

Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 58081 (57882)

SpaceNet AG Mail: [email protected]
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
6bone mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone


End of 6bone Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13
************************************
Yahoo! India Insurance Special: Be informed on the best policies, services, tools and more.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gamma.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20040220/0b9bbd50/attachment.html