[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Should filesystems have undelete (was Get paid for undelete on ext3help)
- Subject: [ale] Should filesystems have undelete (was Get paid for undelete on ext3help)
- From: jknapka at earthlink.net (Joseph A. Knapka)
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 08:44:49 -0600
Irv Mullins wrote:
>
> But wait - even that misadventure wasn't a disaster. Since I had to re-create
> the program from scratch, I was able to incorporate a lot of things I had
> learned while writing the first version. The result was a new program which
> was shorter, cleaner, and faster that the original. Probably with fewer bugs.
> A program which I might never have written if the previous version
> had been available. I wouldn't be surprised if the time spent re-writing will
> be more than offset by time saved in maintaining that program.
And the moral of -this- story is that all developers should
have a daemon running on their system that occasionally deletes
a random swath of source code.... I'll get right on it.
:-)))
-- Joe
"I'd rather chew my leg off than maintain Java code, which
sucks, 'cause I have a lot of Java code to maintain and
the leg surgery is starting to get expensive." - Me
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.