[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Reply-to change
- Subject: [ale] Reply-to change
- From: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)
- Date: Wed Sep 10 18:25:47 2003
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
That has changed since you wrote this.
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:14, Jonathan Rickman wrote:
> I just noticed that the reply-to is now set to all. IMHO this is the worst
> possible configuration. It creates duplicate messages when mistakes are
> made. I know there are two sides of the reply-to argument, but this is
> far from a compromise. Now you have the worst of both sides.
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
http://www.localnetsolutions.com
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics) <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part