[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Woof
- Subject: [ale] Woof
- From: freemyer-ml at NorcrossGroup.com (Greg Freemyer)
- Date: Fri Apr 16 16:36:19 2004
- In-reply-to: <003501c423eb$f9f05360$0a00a8c0@canwebdev>
- References: <003501c423eb$f9f05360$0a00a8c0@canwebdev>
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 15:49, Greg wrote:
> Actually, no, that isn't your right. You can only use deadly force in a
> limited number of situations. One is when you are threatened by same.
> Another is when you believe your life is in danger. Another is when you are
> an agent of the government (military and law enforcement).
>
> The decision on when you are in danger is one a court gets to decide. The
> courts have decided over and over that killing/injuring someone when only
> loss of property is involved is illegal. Live has higher value and is not
> to be taken lightly - so killing or injuring someone involved in the process
> of trespass or breaking/entering is illegal. Even putting up signs to that
> effect is inconsequential.
>
> Greg
>
Not in Texas!!
I was there several years ago when the local paper had a story like
this:
A home owner shot and killed a burglar / trespasser. The home owner got
scared and dumped the body in some local woods. The body was found
yesterday.
The home owner has been identified and charged with littering.
:)
- Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Woof
- From: pete.hardie at sciatl.com (Pete Hardie)
- [ale] Woof
- From: runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)
- [ale] Woof
- From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- References:
- [ale] Woof
- From: runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)