[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!

Subject: [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
Date: Fri Aug 27 20:31:23 2004
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

alelist wrote:

> Thank you for all your input. Hmm... Mr. Summers never replied. Perhaps
> he was trying to be a smart* and correct my grammar...

Paranoid are we?  Let it go, it was an honest question, that's the way I 
read it.  He likely did not follow up as he did not have any insights to 
share.  Or possibly felt insulted by your response to an honest question?

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey       Registered Linux User #108567
                             AT&T Certified UNIX System Programmer - 1995

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
  - From: alelist at christopherrussell.net (alelist)

References:
- [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
  - From: alelist at christopherrussell.net (alelist)
- [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
  - From: charles.shapiro at nubridges.com (Charles Shapiro)
- [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
  - From: alelist at christopherrussell.net (alelist)
- [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
  - From: jimmyc at speedfactory.net (Jim Philips)
- [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
  - From: alelist at christopherrussell.net (alelist)

Prev by Date: [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
Next by Date: [ale] mail headers question
Previous by thread: [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
Next by thread: [ale] opne source equivalent of Symantec ACT!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread