[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sun Aug 1 10:07:42 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wgnlybe ng bayvarn.pbz (X.[. Fnlybe) -->
- <!--x-message-id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0408011003290.22310-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later. -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sun Aug 1 10:07:42 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jtaylor at onlinea.com (J.M. Taylor)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00005.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</li>
If it is required of me that I do these things, I ask for a signed letter
from a higher-up, or the law enforcement agency or whatever, to prove that
I was not acting on my own. It is never right for a systems administrator
to give in to his or her baser nature and use their technical knowlege to
further a complaint against a coworker, unless s/he has been asked to do
this by a superior for legally and ethically correct reasons.
And yes, if my boss told me to gather data about someone that I knew was
goofing off all day but wouldn't give me the signed letter, I would refuse
to do it even if it meant my job. That's how strongly I feel about the
importance of my integrity in what I do. It's also just CYA -- when the
fit hits the shan and it's my word against my boss's about who ordered
collecting the data....no way am I going to get involved in that. I'm
not completely stupid.
IMNSHO this guy isn't a saint or a martyr. He did something
unethical, and unethical acts are unethical regardless of the motivating
reasons. If you steal from your company and give the money to starving
people, it's still stealing. If all he did was send emails about the
boss, maybe he should've taken the time to actually go speak to someone
face-to-face. If he had gotten the go-ahead from a higher-up to do this,
then it would've been fine. It sucks that the boss didn't get fired, but
ALDOT was entirely correct in firing the admin.
Jenn
</end moral high horse>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00009" href="msg00009.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00014" href="msg00014.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jdr at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00027" href="msg00027.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> scherrey at proteus-tech.com (Benjamin Scherrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00005" href="msg00005.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00005.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00007.html">[ale] and another thing (RE: [ot] ALDOT)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00005.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00009.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00006"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00006"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>