[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
In fact we ought to have an OT-ethics: tag on our emails now. :-)
Dow
Courtney Thomas wrote:
> Dow,
>
> Surely you're not saying your job description should be your code of
> ethics :-)
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Courtney
>
>
>
> Dow Hurst wrote:
>
>> Mike,
>> Jenn is right because a sysadmin has extreme access to others privacy
>> without true authorization to actually invade that privacy. It's
>> like having video camera's on people bedrooms all the time but you
>> know you ethically should never look in the viewfinder. It's not
>> your job, since you just run the server. If a proper authority
>> authorizes you to look then your okay, but only then.
>> Dow
>>
>>
>> Mike Panetta wrote:
>>
>>> The only problem with that I can see is your boss will never sign a
>>> letter saying that
>>> you can spy on him. So in effect this means its ok for higher ups
>>> to spy on and fire
>>> lower down people for slacking off (or doing whatever) and its not
>>> ok for lower down
>>> people to spy on and get higher up people fired for doing the same.
>>> This is illogical
>>> and can create a bad climate (one that already exists, how many
>>> people do you know
>>> would be willing to rat out someone important in their company for
>>> doing something harmful to said company?) where stagnation and
>>> immoral and unhealty acts can be
>>> done by higher ups (and are) and cannot be stopped or watched by
>>> anyone else.
>>>
>>> Who watches the watchers?
>>>
>>> Oh, and why is what he did unethical? Why is trying to save
>>> taxpayers (or
>>> in the case of a private company, shareholders) money by checking that
>>> someone is doing the job they are payed (and payed very highly in
>>> the case of CEO's and such) to do, and not wasting money by slacking
>>> off. Why is it unethical for someone lower down in the company to use
>>> the means he has at hands (his knowledge) to check up on someone,
>>> while its not unethical for someone higher up in the company to use the
>>> means he has (someone elses knowledge) to check up on someone?
>>>
>>> Basicly your saying its ok for the CEO's and other corperate
>>> bastards of
>>> the world to get rich by slacking off and telling us what to do, but
>>> its not
>>> ok for us to protect the company by turning them in when they waste the
>>> companys money by slacking off and doing no real work. I think your
>>> sense of ethics is a bit off.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "J.M. Taylor" <jtaylor at onlinea.com>
>>> Sent: Aug 1, 2004 10:24 AM
>>> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or
>>> later.
>>>
>>>
>>> My interpretation of the SAGE code of ethics is the following: I do not
>>> read people's emails, even tho it is within my power. I do not spy on
>>> people, even tho it is within my power and in many cases may prove
>>> their
>>> misdeeds. I do not collect data on people's misdeeds even tho these
>>> people may be harming me on the job. I do not make these decisions. I
>>> just run the server.
>>>
>>> If it is required of me that I do these things, I ask for a signed
>>> letter
>>> from a higher-up, or the law enforcement agency or whatever, to
>>> prove that
>>> I was not acting on my own. It is never right for a systems
>>> administrator
>>> to give in to his or her baser nature and use their technical
>>> knowlege to
>>> further a complaint against a coworker, unless s/he has been asked
>>> to do
>>> this by a superior for legally and ethically correct reasons.
>>>
>>> And yes, if my boss told me to gather data about someone that I knew
>>> was goofing off all day but wouldn't give me the signed letter, I
>>> would refuse to do it even if it meant my job. That's how strongly
>>> I feel about the importance of my integrity in what I do. It's also
>>> just CYA -- when the fit hits the shan and it's my word against my
>>> boss's about who ordered collecting the data....no way am I going to
>>> get involved in that. I'm not completely stupid.
>>>
>>> IMNSHO this guy isn't a saint or a martyr. He did something
>>> unethical, and unethical acts are unethical regardless of the
>>> motivating
>>> reasons. If you steal from your company and give the money to starving
>>> people, it's still stealing. If all he did was send emails about the
>>> boss, maybe he should've taken the time to actually go speak to someone
>>> face-to-face. If he had gotten the go-ahead from a higher-up to do
>>> this,
>>> then it would've been fine. It sucks that the boss didn't get
>>> fired, but
>>> ALDOT was entirely correct in firing the admin.
>>>
>>> Jenn
>>> </end>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ale mailing list
>>> Ale at ale.org
>>> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ale mailing list
>>> Ale at ale.org
>>> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>
>
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00008" href="msg00008.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ahuitzot at mindspring.com (Mike Panetta)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00011" href="msg00011.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00030" href="msg00030.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ccthomas at joimail.com (Courtney Thomas)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00039.html">[ale] Colocation and Atlanta</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00041.html">[ale] OT-Rush concert: Anyone going tonight?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00030.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00013.html">[ale] OT: Well it is going to hit the list sooner or later.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00040"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00040"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>