[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Aug 2 14:59:26 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: serrzlre-zy ng @bepebffUebhc.pbz (Uert Terrzlre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Tape RAID? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Aug 2 14:59:26 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: freemyer-ml at NorcrossGroup.com (Greg Freemyer)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Tape RAID?</li>
Google for RAIT tape drives. I got several hits.
But as far as performance, a new LTO Gen. 2 tape can handle 30 MB / sec.
of data.
With that sort of speed, the issue is typically "how do I get data fast
enough to keep the drive streaming?", not "how do I make the tape drive
faster?".
HTH
Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 10:05, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> Since the write to tape is slow compared to write to HD, is it feasible
> to make a tape RAID process? I have seen several similar things in the
> enterprise realm but they were not quite what I'm envisioning. They
> would do multiple stream backups. All of one file would be on a single
> tape. The next file might be on a different tape.
>
> I'm thinking an evenly split data/parity spread across the array of tape
> drives. This would provide all the joys of RAID for a low cost/GB backup
> system. The aim is to have a tape system that can accept a data stream
> as fast as the hard drives can deliver it.
>
> This would be a real PIA to do using different tape drives that write at
> different speeds. But if the drives all are equivalent, the RAID kernel
> code can be reused to split up the data stream and then a hack on the
> delivery part to support the tape parameters.
>
> Feasible? Bad idea? Been done already? Jim should not try to think
> before the second cup of coffee has been fully ingested?
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00057" href="msg00057.html">[ale] Tape RAID?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00055.html">[ale] Xandros ISO download</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00057.html">[ale] Tape RAID?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00197.html">[ale] ADSL PCI cards?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00057.html">[ale] Tape RAID?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00056"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00056"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>