[no subject]

Microsoft Found Guilty of Misleading Advertising	

	
Posted by CmdrTaco on Wednesday August 25, @08:16AM
from the everybody-play-nicely dept.
gtoomey writes "The UK Advertising Standards Authority has upheld
complaints that Microsoft misled consumers by running advertisements
claiming Linux is 10 times more expensive than Windows. The print
advertisements used "independent research" to compare the cost of Linux
on an expensive mainframe to Windows on a PC."


-- 
Randal Jarrett
RSJ Consulting, Inc
Lawrenceville, GA
(770) 822-1096



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00672" href="msg00672.html">[ale] Microsoft Found Guilty of Misleading Advertising</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> irvm at ellijay.com (Irv Mullins)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00675" href="msg00675.html">[ale] Microsoft Found Guilty of Misleading Advertising</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jdr at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00661.html">[ale] wireless lan that's not wifi?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00663.html">[ale] wireless lan that's not wifi?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00663.html">[ale] wireless lan that's not wifi?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00672.html">[ale] Microsoft Found Guilty of Misleading Advertising</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00662"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00662"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>