[no subject]

Yes, if you want the faster speed via speedfactory, you're going to 
pppoe.  It's cheaper for them, therefore they want you to go that route.

> 
> I hope that there are at least a few others who have dealt with this
> issue.

Yes, I have, as noted, works with smoothwall as well as a firewall I 
built from scratch.  If you want a quick solution, look at smoothwall.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey       Registered Linux User #108567
                             AT&T Certified UNIX System Programmer - 1995


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00735.html">[ale] Coyote Linux PPPoE negotiation with Speedfactory</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00737.html">[ale] Coyote Linux PPPoE negotiation with Speedfactory</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00740.html">[ale] Coyote Linux PPPoE negotiation with Speedfactory</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00749.html">[ale] Coyote Linux PPPoE negotiation with Speedfactory</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00736"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00736"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>