[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] Voicepulse question
- Subject: [ale] [OT] Voicepulse question
- From: sriad at uab.edu (Aditya Srinivasan)
- Date: Wed Dec 8 10:27:38 2004
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, James Baldwin wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2004, at 19:01, Geoffrey wrote:
> > Aditya Srinivasan wrote:
> >> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Geoffrey wrote:
> >>> Aditya Srinivasan wrote:
> >>>> My ISP (Biltmore Communications) hands out dark addresses.
> >>>
> >>> ??? dark addressess ???
> >> I've always thought that IP addresses behind a NAT were called 'dark'
> >> ... since you cant see them from the outside.
> >> But a very quick search on google does not seem to indicate any such
> >> nomenclature.
> >> Will have to think about where I learnt this :)
> >
> > Private ip is the terminology I've always seen.
>
> RFC 1918 space is the most common reference to such space among network
> engineers I've seen. "Private ip" space is somewhat ambiguous and is
> sometimes confused with RIR allocations to private industries. "Dark
> addresses" could lead one to believe they are assigning currently
> unallocated netblocks to customers, which is the first thought that
> crossed my mind when I heard it.
Thanks for the clarification.
sriad