[ale] Question on Current Red Hat Update Policies

[jsheets at yahoo.com (Jerald Sheets)]

Yes.

RHEL is a commercial project, with licenses and the whole software company
thing.

FC is a "bleeding edge" project, with the latest and greatest (and
unstablest....is that a word?)  stuff in it.  You *can*, however, do regular
updates through apt-rpm and yum.

I'm using FC2 & 3 in production, becase if it came down to it, I could
update what I have to whatever version I want...no troubles.

Jerald M. Sheets jr.
Sr. UNIX Systems Administrator
(404) 293-8762
**********
>su -
Password:
# cat /dev/flood > /dev/earth
# rdev noah+beasts
# dd if=noah+beasts of=/dev/earth

-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 11:16 AM
To: ALE
Subject: [ale] Question on Current Red Hat Update Policies

I abandoned RH for my home use when they let go of the home user market and
now I am faced with having to use them for a project.  I have downloaded
RHEL 3 and Fedora Core 3 and was wondering if one needs to buy a
subscription to update RHEL or not.  I was also wondering what (if any)
differences there are between RHEL and FC besides the official RH company
support for RHEL.

TIA,

Greg

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.0 - Release Date: 12/17/2004
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.0 - Release Date: 12/17/2004