[no subject]

Not yet determined, for sure.  Both would be nice.  But even it's  a push, 
it's not necessary to push to all nodes at the same time.

> A pull combined with a randomizing clock function might work 
> better. Dow


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00618" href="msg00618.html">[ale] ssh for automated management</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at mindspring.com (Dow_Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00620.html">[ale] ssh for automated management</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00622.html">[ale] ssh for automated management</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00618.html">[ale] ssh for automated management</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00634.html">[ale] Hacked to spam??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00621"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00621"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>