[no subject]

How is Logcheck better than Logwatch?  I'm setting up a system with a
loghost machine (w/o external access; it accepts ONLY syslog UDP packets,
on an internal network) and I was looking at logwatch and logcheck (and
swatch), and decided that logwatch seemed to be a better mechanism for
getting information and statistics for at least basic filtering, and
figured anything "unexpected" could be then tracked more manually

Is logcheck (that's the logsentry one right?) really better?

--attriel


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00673" href="msg00673.html">[ale] Logcheck vs Logwatch</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> bob at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00634" href="msg00634.html">[ale] Hacked to spam??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> johnmills at speakeasy.net (John Mills)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00651" href="msg00651.html">[ale] Hacked to spam??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> bob at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00666.html">[ale] need working dialup</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00668.html">[ale] XFS multi-mount</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00651.html">[ale] Hacked to spam??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00673.html">[ale] Logcheck vs Logwatch</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00667"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00667"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>