[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-date: Tue Feb 3 21:54:28 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wnzrf ng fhzaref.ngu.pk (Xnzrf Ehzaref) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Feb 3 21:54:28 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)</li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</li>
I know that IPCop is a fork of Smoothwall but it forked a long time ago. I will
be playing with both of them in a virtual environment but it may be some time
before I get that set up and I would like to know if someone already has an
opinion of one over the other (e.g. this one does this where that one doesn't
type stuff).
--
I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems. -- Linus Torvalds
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00078" href="msg00078.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jb at devsea.com (John Wells)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00082" href="msg00082.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> miguelquintero at bellsouth.net (miguel)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00162" href="msg00162.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> keith at iqtv.com (Keith Morris - IQ)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00189" href="msg00189.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00076.html">[ale] DVD burning software?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00078.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00156.html">[ale] DVD burning software?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00078.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00077"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00077"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>