[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed Feb 4 22:09:16 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: xwxehz ng pbzpnfg.arg (Yriva Yehzjvrqr) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas -->
- <!--x-reference: 1075902202.14425.5.camel@bluetoo -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1075947892.20921.6.camel@bluetoo --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle) -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed Feb 4 22:09:16 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: kjkrum at comcast.net (Kevin Krumwiede)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <1075947892.20921.6.camel@bluetoo></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas> <1075902202.14425.5.camel@bluetoo> <<a href="msg00087.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00109.html">[email protected]</a>> <1075947892.20921.6.camel@bluetoo></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</li>
> yourself exposed. The same concept applies to "obfuscating" email
> addresses. If they can be read by a human, they can be read by a
> machine. I like the image substitution idea, but remember it can be
> OCR'ed... unless it is near impossibe to read (see above comments).
You're right, they *can* be read by a machine. However, obfuscating
them makes it less likely that they will be. There are countless ways
of obfuscating an email address so that it can still be read by a human.
Any given harvester bot will *not* be looking for every single
variation. Likewise, something as simple as changing the name of a
resource or running a server on a non-standard port may do nothing to
stop a determined attacker specifically targeting your systems, but it
*will* stop most worms, viruses, and skript kiddies dead in their
tracks. If you evaluate risk as a product of how potentially damaging
something could be vs. how likely it is to occur, then simple measures
like these should not be discounted.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00150" href="msg00150.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00151" href="msg00151.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00101" href="msg00101.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00087" href="msg00087.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00109" href="msg00109.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00145" href="msg00145.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00147.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00149.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00145.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00150.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00148"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00148"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>