[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed Feb 4 22:43:44 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: tebhcf ng [email protected] ([email protected]) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1075951320.20921.31.camel@bluetoo --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle) -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed Feb 4 22:43:44 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <1075951320.20921.31.camel@bluetoo></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas> <<a href="msg00148.html">[email protected]</a>> <1075951320.20921.31.camel@bluetoo></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</li>
It is well within our means. We have expert programmers on this list.
> Harvesting emails alone is not responsible for 1 single spam.
Yes. You are correct. Um, after the emails are harvested, the emails are
organized and someone writes a message and pushes send.
> My
> arguments have been that obfuscation only inconveniences normal folks,
> rarely spammers.
Really? How many times have you pulled email addresses out of the archives to
contact . . . . .(oh shoot, he will say that *he* does it "everyday"). :)
> I have yet to hear of one spammer who complains about
> obfuscation, but we do hear from them on other much more successful
> fronts.
It is so easy to slog, the spammers can collect thosands of emails in the time
it takes to try to write the code to un-obfuscate email addresses.
Further, spammers know that the ROI is probably going to be a bit higher (and
the flames a LOT lower) for email lists that are NOT blatantly anti-spam.
Finally, geez. You know all of this.
I would ask you what your malfunction is, but it doesn't seem like to have a
self-diagnostic program over there.
The Bottom Line:
Please have a big heart and let us *peacefully* obfuscate the email addresses
in the archives.
--
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ChangingLINKS.com">http://www.ChangingLINKS.com</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00154" href="msg00154.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00148" href="msg00148.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kjkrum at comcast.net (Kevin Krumwiede)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00150" href="msg00150.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00152.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00154.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00150.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00154.html">[ale]OT It begins... (jumping into the middle)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00153"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00153"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>