[no subject]

James Sumners

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:54:05 -0500
James Sumners <james at sumners.ath.cx> wrote:

> I am considering replacing a Linksys WRT54G with a Linux box. The Linksys is
> working fine but it doesn't quite cut it. My question to you is, would you
> recommend Smoothwall 2.0 over IPCop 1.3.0 or vice versa? I don't really want
> to sit down and write my own firewall scripts and web front end when there is
> already a solution.
> 
> I know that IPCop is a fork of Smoothwall but it forked a long time ago. I
> will be playing with both of them in a virtual environment but it may be some
> time before I get that set up and I would like to know if someone already has
> an opinion of one over the other (e.g. this one does this where that one
> doesn't type stuff).
> 
> -- 
> 
> I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
> looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
> technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making
> money than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds
> 


-- 

I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00193" href="msg00193.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> thomaswood at mac.com (Thomas Wood)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00209" href="msg00209.html">Router distro (was Re: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00077" href="msg00077.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00188.html">[ale] OT: Kdevelop3</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00190.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00168.html">[ale] Poor support (was Smoothwall 2.0 vs IPCop 1.3.0)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00193.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00189"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00189"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>