[no subject]

That's precisely why I posted it. Seeing it is a "good sign" for that reason, 
or it could be a "bad sign" that it will give voting systems a reason to "go 
back" to the way it was before (for years to come).
-- 
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ChangingLINKS.com";>http://www.ChangingLINKS.com</a>


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00196" href="msg00196.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00183" href="msg00183.html">[ale] Voting Security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00190" href="msg00190.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00191.html">[ale] SCP problem</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00193.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00190.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00196.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00192"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00192"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>