[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Feb 5 23:51:58 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: nneba ng cq.bet (nneba) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] [OT] Voting Security -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Feb 5 23:51:58 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00192.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00183.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00190.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00192.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] [OT] Voting Security</li>
Judging from the research results, "going back" would be actually be a great
leap forward.
Recent comprehensive, real world evaluations of voting systems
[ <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vote.caltech.edu/Reports/2001report.html">http://www.vote.caltech.edu/Reports/2001report.html</a> ]
show paper ballots with human tabulation can average an error rate of less
than 1%. Adding an electronic scanner system for tabulating paper ballots
kicks that rate up to about 1.5%. Punch card systems hover around 2.5% error
rates, a number which, coincidentally, is also the best case result for all
the currently deployed electronic and touch screen systems.
So, after our various bomb and bankrupt governments dump several billion of
our tax dollars into the pockets of a pack of technological corporate carpet
baggers, the absolute best system we will be able to hope for will be one
only slightly worse than what we already had, and that's only guaranteed in
the rare places where electronic systems are implemented with thorough
auditing and public tabulation.
Like I said before, we can hope that stories like this will wake more people
up to the serious fraud being perpetrated against them. Any electronic voting
system that lacks full auditing, public accounting, open source code and
voter verified paper trails is demonstrably flawed will be highly susceptible
to both external tampering and internal corruption.
peace
aaron
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00222" href="msg00222.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> bob at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00183" href="msg00183.html">[ale] Voting Security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00190" href="msg00190.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00192" href="msg00192.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00195.html">[ale] OT: Kdevelop3</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00199.html">[ale] removing galeon</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00192.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00222.html">[ale] [OT] Voting Security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00196"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00196"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>