[no subject]

</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00189" href="msg00189.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00209" href="msg00209.html">Router distro (was Re: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00217" href="msg00217.html">Router distro (was Re: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> vernard at cc.gatech.edu (Vernard Martin)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00226.html">Router distro (was Re: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00229.html">Router distro (was Re: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00234.html">Router distro (was Re: [ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00098.html">[ale] TightVNC</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00228"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00228"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>