[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Wed Feb 11 13:20:45 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: owbea ng fppf.fjneguzber.rqh (Pwbea Rvggzre-Dbpur) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected]-a-geek.com -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] sharing an experience....debian.... -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Wed Feb 11 13:20:45 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: bjorn at sccs.swarthmore.edu (Bjorn Dittmer-Roche)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00388.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00388.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....</li>
> Hi all, just wanted to share a quick experience and get your opinions if
> you are willing.
>
> I have been using linux off and on since Redhat 5.1 and exclusively for
> the last 3 years at home. I have pretty much been a redhat man with no
> complaints. I use Fedora Core 1 on my 2 main machines at home (both
> 1.6GHz). Well, recently I got a PIII 866 to play with and installed FC1
> on it and the speed was really quite sluggish. Played with a few more
> distros which I wasn't really happy with. Well, I've always been afraid
> of Debian with it's infamous hell-installer, but with it's new Beta
> installer, I decided to try it.
You can use Knoppix as an installer, too, but I think that puts you in
unstable. Anyway, the old installer ain't that bad.
>
> After a pretty painless net-install, I was totally shocked with the
> speed of Debian. Easily twice as fast as Fedora on the 866 using the
> *SAME* software (Gnome 2.4, KDE 3.1.5, OpenOffice, Evolution, XFT
> support, antialiasing, etc.) I still have not gotten the sound working,
> but believe that I will be able to (with a few posts to the ALE list :))
> The only main difference is that I formatted / with reiserfs instead of
> ext3 with FC1.
There's always something with debian, I have to admit..... RH really has
the install thing worked out.
> I was wondering if anyone could guess why debian would be sooooo much
> faster with basically the same "Desktop" type of configuration? Do many
> of you use Debian?
The kernel might be more suited to your hardware. Things might be compiled
with more agressive optimization. (on my dell laptop, the RH 9 stock
kernel outperforms anything else I've tested, but that's just me.)
> I will probably stick with Debian on this machine to learn about the
> different ins-and-outs. I absolutely *love* apt-get for debian. I have
> used it with rpms on redhat, but it seems better with debs...dunno...
COOOOL! I love debian.
bjorn
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00388" href="msg00388.html">[ale] sharing an experience....debian....</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> keith at iqtv.com (Keith Morris - IQ)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00388.html">[ale] sharing an experience....debian....</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00390.html">[ale] sharing an experience....debian....</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00388.html">[ale] sharing an experience....debian....</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00390.html">[ale] sharing an experience....debian....</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00389"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00389"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>