[no subject]

metruk
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ronald Chmara" <ron at Opus1.COM>
To: <freemyer-ml at NorcrossGroup.com>; "Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts"
<ale at ale.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [ale] Philosophical question


> On Feb 11, 2004, at 6:40 PM, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 09:36, Jerald Sheets wrote:
> >> Hey folks.
> >>
> >> Philosophical question for you...
> >>
> >> If you were offered 40% more a year to do the work of an applications
> >> admin (i.e. no root access), would you take it?
> >>
> >> i told a recruiter that money wasn't really important in the relo I'm
> >> trying to accomplish and then he came back with a high enough number i
> >> can't ignore him.
> >>
> >> so that's the question, would *you* give up root access for a pile of
> >> cash?
> > It seems to be the way of the future for big companies.
> >
> > One of the guys who works for my company is permanently at a large
> > customer doing application/OS support.  He will be losing
> > root/administrator access to all servers in the data center (DC).
> >
> > Instead trouble tickets and "shadow" sessions will be used anytime he
> > needs to do root level activities.  And the sessions have to be very
> > short because they are hard to come by.
> >
> > The bad part is that the IT staff is really not that knowledgable, so
> > he
> > will now have to have a test machine in the lab to work out all his
> > admin procedures on.
>
> I think that this is really the bigger question... not if one has root,
> but the abilities of those who do have root access, and those who
> don't. Being of the anti-root persuasion, I don't think that anybody
> *should* have root, unless they're physically at console (yes, you
> *can* do just about anything but add hardware without root).
>
> Of course, if one doesn't have the ability to reasonably do their job
> without having root access, that's a problem, but almost all sysad,
> programming, dba, (etc. etc.) tasks simply don't require it. sudo will
> suffice for the very rare tool/program that is needed (in most cases).
>
> -Bop
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00454" href="msg00454.html">[ale] Philosophical question</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mnmagee at earthlink.net (Matthew Magee)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00328" href="msg00328.html">[ale] Philosophical question</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jsheets at yahoo.com (Jerald Sheets)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00402" href="msg00402.html">[ale] Philosophical question</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> freemyer-ml at NorcrossGroup.com (Greg Freemyer)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00403" href="msg00403.html">[ale] Philosophical question</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ron at Opus1.COM (Ronald Chmara)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00404.html">[ale] sharing an experience....debian....</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00406.html">[ale] [Fwd: Internet Cache Usage]</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00403.html">[ale] Philosophical question</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00454.html">[ale] Philosophical question</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00405"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00405"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>