[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Feb 12 05:49:13 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: rfbgrevp ng 3gvzrf25.arg (Urbsserl) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1076557029.30236.818.camel@localhost -->
- <!--x-reference: 1076557459.3920.828.camel@localhost -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1076576467.30236.848.camel@localhost --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: -O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....) -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Feb 12 05:49:13 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <1076576467.30236.848.camel@localhost></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00388.html">[email protected]</a>> <1076557029.30236.818.camel@localhost> <1076557459.3920.828.camel@localhost> <<a href="msg00411.html">[email protected]</a>> <1076576467.30236.848.camel@localhost></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: -O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</li>
I would guess that it's possible that later iterations of gcc will
likely not target older hardware as well as the newer stuff. Just a guess.
--
Until later, Geoffrey Registered Linux User #108567
Building secure systems inspite of Microsoft
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00388" href="msg00388.html">[ale] sharing an experience....debian....</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> keith at iqtv.com (Keith Morris - IQ)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00412" href="msg00412.html">-O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00413" href="msg00413.html">-O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00411" href="msg00411.html">-O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mmacumbe at pigseye.kennesaw.edu (Matthew Macumber)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00417" href="msg00417.html">-O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00417.html">-O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00419.html">[ale] Linux group releases enterprise guidelines</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00417.html">-O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00425.html">-O3 vs. -O2 (was Re: [ale] sharing an experience....debian....)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00418"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00418"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>