[no subject]

> IHMO,
> i think OpenBSD is more secure simply because it is developed at a
> slower pace than Debian, so chances are that out-of-the-box it will be
> more stable(== secure?)

This has to be the first time anyone's ever accused anything of slower 
development than Debian ;-)

It's also wrong -- OpenBSD is released twice a year, May 1 and Nov 1. 
Debian's on a multi-year release cycle.

later,
chris


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00238" href="msg00238.html">[ale] Questions on Debian public server security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00239" href="msg00239.html">[ale] Questions on Debian public server security</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> miguelquintero at bellsouth.net (miguel)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00427.html">[ale] Free Lindows Developers Edition</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00429.html">[ale] GNU/Zebra</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00239.html">[ale] Questions on Debian public server security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00270.html">[ale] Questions on Debian public server security</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00428"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00428"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>