[no subject]

If you are looking for a (relatively) cheap, small, digital camera take a look
at this one:
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start;sid=OtRMG7EbLnxMGfE1WQZGEP4UX3NW2wKBobA=?ProductSKU=DSCU30KITIS&amp;Dept=dcc&amp;CategoryName=dcc_DIDigitalCameras_CybershotUDigitalCameras";>http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start;sid=OtRMG7EbLnxMGfE1WQZGEP4UX3NW2wKBobA=?ProductSKU=DSCU30KITIS&amp;Dept=dcc&amp;CategoryName=dcc_DIDigitalCameras_CybershotUDigitalCameras</a>

It operates as a USB mass storage device and takes decent digital images. Here
is one as an example:
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://student.claytonstate.net/~csu10066/files/Contemplation.jpg";>http://student.claytonstate.net/~csu10066/files/Contemplation.jpg</a>

James Sumners

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:00:09 -0500
William Bagwell &lt;rb211 at tds.net&gt; wrote:

&gt; On Saturday 14 February 2004 11:09 am, Chris Fowler wrote:
&gt; 
&gt; &gt; I was at Wolf Camera and they are now selling one-time use digital
&gt; &gt; cameras.  You take the pictures then they develop them.  The do not
&gt; &gt; have a port on them.  I assume one is on the inside.  Has anyone
&gt; &gt; figured out how to suck the images off?
&gt; 
&gt; My recollection of this /. article, is that it was *way* more trouble than 
&gt; it's worth.
&gt; 
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/12/2354206&amp;mode=thread&amp;tid=152&amp;tid=185&amp;tid=188";>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/12/2354206&amp;mode=thread&amp;tid=152&amp;tid=185&amp;tid=188</a>
&gt; 
&gt; YMMV Have fun:-)
&gt; -- 
&gt; William
&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>


-- 

I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00512" href="msg00512.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kjkrum at comcast.net (Kevin Krumwiede)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00488" href="msg00488.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00490" href="msg00490.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rb211 at tds.net (William Bagwell)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00492.html">[ale] Kernel comparison: Web serving on 2.4 and 2.6</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00494.html">[ale] Kernel comparison: Web serving on 2.4 and 2.6</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00490.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00512.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00493"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00493"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>