[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sun Feb 15 22:33:49 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: psbjyre ng bhgcbfgfragvary.pbz (Quevf Tbjyre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 1076902436.4830.1.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sun Feb 15 22:33:49 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00527.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00512.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00513.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00527.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</li>
On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 21:44, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:42:24 -0500
> "Dan Lambert" <danlambert at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Right now, I'm thinking about the Sony DSC-F828. I need an SLR, and
> > the 8 mpxl is the picture quality I'm after.
>
> I haven't had a chance to play with the F828. I work in a relatively
> small Ritz store and we don't keep everything in stock. In general, my
> advice is to get only as much camera as you *need* *right now*. There
> will always be something better right around the corner, and you pay a
> high price for the latest and greatest when it may be only marginally
> better. If you came into my store, the first thing I'd try to figure
> out is why you think you need an 8MP SLR. (Because some people think
> they need that much to get a decent 8x10... I blame the advertisers.)
>
> That said, I think the F828 is an amazing camera for the price. Even if
> you don't really need 8MP, the lens alone is worth it. For various
> reasons (engineering difficulties, weight, price...) they simply don't
> make lenses with that kind zoom and aperture range for traditional SLRs.
> It's possible on a digital in part because of the smaller size of the
> image sensor. About the closest film equivalent would be a 70-200
> f/2.8, and those can easily cost you well over $1000 for the lens alone.
>
> Krum
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00512" href="msg00512.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kjkrum at comcast.net (Kevin Krumwiede)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00513" href="msg00513.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> danlambert at bellsouth.net (Dan Lambert)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00527" href="msg00527.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kjkrum at comcast.net (Kevin Krumwiede)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00528.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00530.html">[ale] Any MySQL Experts around?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00527.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00516.html">[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00529"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00529"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>