[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Feb 24 08:04:05 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: psbjyre ng bhgcbfgfragvary.pbz (Quevf Tbjyre) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 1077627760.22783.2.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Linux vs XP Embedded -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Feb 24 08:04:05 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</li>
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 02:03, Joe Knapka wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been given an interesting realtime control system to build, and
> my employer wants to evaluate both Linux (woohoo!) and Windows XP
> Embedded (bummer). I know some of you have some embedded/realtime
> experience with Linux, so I'd like your opinions on this subject. I
> can't say much about the application itself, except that it will be
> handling something in the neighborhood of 50Gbytes per day (that's a
> G) of IP and serial traffic, and must meet hard deadlines on the order
> of once per second (but a missed deadline won't kill anyone - this is
> not a medical or aviation application. We can probably even recover
> from a missed deadline, but that sort of thing should be kept to an
> absolute minimum).
>
> I'm thinking that a 2.6-series kernel would be the way to go with
> this. I understand 2.6 integrates the preemptive and low-latency
> patches, and that 2.6 can be built in a VM-less configuration so as to
> remove latency associated with demand paging.
>
> Does anyone have any further suggestions or alternatives? Also, is
> anyone here in a position to evaluate the relative strengths of Linux
> vs XP Embedded? Personally I feel that the "Embedded" part of that
> name is probably pure marketing hype, but I could be wrong. It is hard
> to see how Linux could possibly be a *worse* choice then XP in this
> domain, though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Joe Knapka
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00871" href="msg00871.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00859" href="msg00859.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00863.html">[ale] Laptop questions before purchase.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00865.html">[ale] Laptop questions before purchase.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00859.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00871.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00864"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00864"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>