[no subject]

So if they have to pay for something they would prefer to pay for a
Microsoft solution?


> -- Joe
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 02:03, Joe Knapka wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > 
> > > I've been given an interesting realtime control system to build, and
> > > my employer wants to evaluate both Linux (woohoo!) and Windows XP
> > > Embedded (bummer).  I know some of you have some embedded/realtime
> > > experience with Linux, so I'd like your opinions on this subject.  I
> > > can't say much about the application itself, except that it will be
> > > handling something in the neighborhood of 50Gbytes per day (that's a
> > > G) of IP and serial traffic, and must meet hard deadlines on the order
> > > of once per second (but a missed deadline won't kill anyone - this is
> > > not a medical or aviation application. We can probably even recover
> > > from a missed deadline, but that sort of thing should be kept to an
> > > absolute minimum).
> > > 
> > > I'm thinking that a 2.6-series kernel would be the way to go with
> > > this.  I understand 2.6 integrates the preemptive and low-latency
> > > patches, and that 2.6 can be built in a VM-less configuration so as to
> > > remove latency associated with demand paging.
> > > 
> > > Does anyone have any further suggestions or alternatives?  Also, is
> > > anyone here in a position to evaluate the relative strengths of Linux
> > > vs XP Embedded?  Personally I feel that the "Embedded" part of that
> > > name is probably pure marketing hype, but I could be wrong.  It is hard
> > > to see how Linux could possibly be a *worse* choice then XP in this
> > > domain, though.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > -- Joe Knapka
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
&gt; &gt; &gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; &gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; &gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; &gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; 


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00880" href="msg00880.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> aaron at pd.org (aaron)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00859" href="msg00859.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00864" href="msg00864.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00871" href="msg00871.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00872.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00874.html">[ale] Laptop questions before purchase.</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00872.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00880.html">[ale] Linux vs XP Embedded</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00873"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00873"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>