[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] SMB options
- Subject: [ale] SMB options
- From: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)
- Date: Sat Jan 10 12:20:28 2004
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Try a login authenticated web access.
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 11:30, David Hamm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an FTP server sittting on the Internet. One group of users uploads
> files via FTP the other group downloads those files via SMB. Securing SMB
> communications in most cases is handeled by listing the SMB users's IP
> address in an IPTables rule with a -j ACCEPT. But recently I gained an SMB
> user an ALLTel's network and ALLTel blocks port 135. The only options I can
> come up with is eithher FreeSwan or PopTop and from recent experiences I'm
> not excited about using either. I wonder if I could run SMB on another port?
> Under Linux I don't see a problem but the Windows workstations mounting the
> share can't be modified since they also participate in an SMB based LAN. Any
> suggestions are welcomed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
http://www.localnetsolutions.com
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part