[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Open Source Apps
- Subject: [ale] Open Source Apps
- From: aaron at pd.org (aaron)
- Date: Sat Jan 17 02:12:19 2004
- In-reply-to: <001b01c3dc8b$994819f0$0a00a8c0@atlas>
- References: <001b01c3dc8b$994819f0$0a00a8c0@atlas>
On Friday 16 January 2004 18:51, Greg wrote:
> I just don't think that 99.9% of US home computer users *want* linux or
> anything else. I think that 99.9% of the time 99.9% of the people will
> pick/choose/want/insist upon MS. [snip]
The real problem is that the majority of any percentage of consumers who might
currently settle for the marginal products of Micro$haft (whether the number
is factually stated or a 99.9% fabrication) have never had an opportunity to
receive honest, informative exposure to any of the alternatives. The
extortionist, exclusionary criminal monoply obstructions of Micro$haft
corrupt the free market to the extent that most people have little
significant access to experiencing, comparing, purchasing or using any
computing platform alternatives. .
While geeks may exhibit a special appreciation for the more esoteric aspects
of the computer gadgets and gizmos world, their basic consumer requisites are
the same as they are for any other technology consumer: they want a reliable,
open, comprehensible and secure product from a company or community that
respects, appreciates and supports their patronage. Informed technology
consumers know that Micro$haft fails to offer real advantages in any of those
critical points.
The arguments come back to a frequently prooven failing of capitalist systems.
Simply stated, competitor exclusion becomes easier to pursue than product
excellence when there are few ethical consequences to mediate the greed
motive.
peace
aaron