[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Re: OT It begins...
- Subject: [ale] Re: OT It begins...
- From: jasonday at worldnet.att.net (Jason Day)
- Date: Tue Jan 27 16:59:12 2004
- In-reply-to: <1075232055.21925.3.camel@bluetoo>
- References: <001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas> <[email protected]> <1075184807.16346.105.camel@bluetoo> <[email protected]> <1075225686.21165.21.camel@bluetoo> <[email protected]> <1075232055.21925.3.camel@bluetoo>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:34:15PM -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> > Any of the archives at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ .
>
> Hah! I only made 2 click and found 4 email addresses. Do you seriously
> think MARC is protected from harvesting? Come on now.
No, of course not. All I said was that the examples I gave obfuscated
the from address. Were the 4 email addresses you found unobfuscated and
in the From: header?
>
> I contend that a few of the people discussing this issue have no idea
> what they are proposing and/or trying to prevent. Don't make me break
> out my credentials on this issue. ;)
Agreed. Trying to obfuscate or strip out every email addy in an archive
is certainly nontrivial but also not the right thing to do, IMHO. As I
said before, message bodies should be archived as-is. Simple
obfuscation of the from header is reasonable though, and apparently easy
to setup in mailman (default?).
Jason
--
Jason Day jasonday at
http://jasonday.home.att.net worldnet dot att dot net
"Of course I'm paranoid, everyone is trying to kill me."
-- Weyoun-6, Star Trek: Deep Space 9