[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale]OT It begins...
- Subject: [ale]OT It begins...
- From: ale at sixit.com (Robert Reese)
- Date: Wed Jan 28 02:19:02 2004
- In-reply-to: <1075273495.3989.11.camel@bluetoo>
- References: <001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas> <[email protected]> <1075224981.21165.15.camel@bluetoo> <[email protected]> <1075236155.22152.27.camel@bluetoo> <[email protected]> <1075273495.3989.11.camel@bluetoo>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 1/28/2004 at 2:04 AM Jim Popovitch wrote:
>On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 01:55, Robert Reese wrote:
>
>> Irrelevant to the original thread. I'm not worried about spam
>> coming over the list.
>
>Good, because it isn't. It is coming (or so others claim) direct to
>endusers by spammers who are harvesting the list archives and/or
>subscribed to the list.
Exactly what I want to see changed: the way archives are created.
That's all.
>> The archive, being controlled by the ALE server, is
>> where the proper placement of the filtering.
>>
>> Nice try, though... keep it up.
>
>Huh?
You really are doing a good job trying to impress upon us how
difficult the task of keeping spam at bay at the user's server level.
I appreciate your effort; I'm hoping that you'd continue your
efforts toward the archive creation filtering process. :c)
Cheers,
Robert~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQBdhdLw8BOWncaQMEQKfvACeKM5+XZUK45o7St9XHdWRjsiEldIAoJ1a
uEzGPwggMOl13XgPStH35ojd
=jKmI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Type: DH/DSS 4096/1024 AES-256
Key ID: 0xA771A40C
Fingerprint: CAE2 81CA A7CD 6681 341C E3A9 BC3C 04E5 A771 A40C