[no subject]

Mike


Michael Mealling wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 12:58, Preston Boyington wrote:
> 
>>I typically don't cut/paste from other places, but this was thought
>>provoking:
> 
> 
> I'm currently the chair of several working groups within what was the
> AutoID standards process. It has since become part of UCC which is now
> known as EPCGlobal. I'll try and speak to some of this and some of the
> misconceptions about RFID and its capabilities.
> 
> 
>>Wal-Mart believes RFID is the future of inventory management 
>>and has set a deadline of January 2005 for its top 100 suppliers 
>>to fit their products with the chips. Other suppliers have until 2006 
>>to implement the technology, providing the push necessary for 
>>RFID to one day replace the barcode.
> 
> 
> To be specific, Walmart is requiring the use of field programmable 96
> bit tags. This means that its possible, with an RFID writer, to
> reprogram these chips in the field.
> 
> 
>>Wal-Mart's January 2005 deadline has now been matched by
>>the Department of Defense for its 43,000 suppliers as well. The DoD
>>wants to be able to better coordinate supplies to its forces and
>>believes RFID chips are the perfect solution for making sure troops
>>in the field are properly equipped at all times. Other companies
>>such as Texas Instruments Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Wal-Mart
>>competitor Target are also looking into RFID technology.
> 
> 
> And every single one has no intentions of deploying any customer facing
> RFID applications. RFID chips are to easy to defeat. Heck, most RFID
> writers will burn out a chip if you leave it there to long. 
> 
> 
>>While still a long way off, analysts believe RFID tags will
>>eventually be found on every product in the store. Those with
>>privacy concerns worry that, some day, people might be tracked
>>through the RFID tags on the things they've purchased. Some RFID
>>enthusiasts envision a can of soda being tracked from manufacture
>>to warehouse to store to a customer's RFID-equipped refrigerator.
> 
> 
> So far there are no use cases or business models that suggest its
> worthwhile to tag a single can of coke. The RF wouldn't make it through
> the can, much less the watery substances inside it. Cigarrete
> manufacturers hate RFID because of the foil in their packages. RFID
> doesn't work well on things like cases of liquid detergent. Hardly
> anyone in supply chain management thinks anyone will ever tag actual
> individual products.
> 
> 
>>Despite the concerns, RFID is moving ahead and, according to one
>>expert, "People who cannot come up to speed on this technology are
>>going to be left behind. Eventually, it's going to be a way of
>>life."
> 
> 
> Unless you actively manage a warehouse or an assembly line (i.e. you
> deal with actual RFID readers/writers) then 'technology' is really just
> standardized web services and DNS. We use DNS to actually lookup the
> product code that's in the tag. Actually, there's no reason the entire
> EPC Network architecture can't be used with existing bar code readers.
> 
> RFID is interesting but there's nothing specific about it that's hard or
> paradigm changing that the simple application of 'wireless' isn't the
> complete equivalent of. You have to realize, most of the people in
> supply chain management still think in terms of 'big iron' and assembly
> line workers. Those of on this list naturally assume that anything
> electronic can and will be wirelessly accessible one day....
> 
> -MM
> 
> 
> 
>>RELATED LINKS:
>>
>>Wal-Mart Will Use Radio ID Tags To Track Goods, Raise
>>     Efficiency - Yahoo News:
&gt;&gt;&lt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ibd/20031224/bs_ibd_ibd/2003";>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ibd/20031224/bs_ibd_ibd/2003</a>
&gt;&gt;1224general&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;A Free Big Brother in Every Pack - The Sydney Morning Herald:
&gt;&gt;&lt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/19/1071337156806.html";>http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/19/1071337156806.html</a>&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;Summit Group Confirms Use of ID Chip - The Washington Times:
&gt;&gt;&lt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20031217-115051-5373r.htm";>http://www.washtimes.com/national/20031217-115051-5373r.htm</a>&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;Jan 2005 Radio ID Supply Tag Deadline Remains - Forbes:
&gt;&gt;&lt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/newswire/2003/12/03/rtr1168579.html";>http://www.forbes.com/markets/newswire/2003/12/03/rtr1168579.html</a>&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;Defense Dept. Working to Resolve RFID Standards Issue - ComputerWorld:
&gt;&gt;&lt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/erp/story/0,10801,87808,00.html";>http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/erp/story/0,10801,87808,00.html</a>
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;Sun Sets Up European RFID Test Center - CNet:
&gt;&gt;&lt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-5113755.html?tag=nefd_top";>http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-5113755.html?tag=nefd_top</a>&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;My initial concerns are with Microsoft and the possible privacy issues.
&gt;&gt;With their DRM push I imagine having to &quot;prove&quot; you own the software by
&gt;&gt;having it in close proximity to your machine.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; RFID is to easy to spoof to make this doable. Plus, what's the actual
&gt; value proposition for that?
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt;&gt;Also, how will Linux get involved with M$ already at the forefront?  M$ will
&gt;&gt;probably say that proprietary software is the only way to protect the
&gt;&gt;information and try and shut an open source movement out.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; MS isn't at the forefront. They've only recently joined the consortia.
&gt; Nearly every company involved is behind having an open source reference
&gt; implementation available...
&gt; 
&gt; Plus, its kind of hard to 'shut an open source movement out' when the
&gt; technology is all based on open, existing Internet standards....
&gt; 
&gt; -MM
&gt; 
&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; Ale mailing list
&gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>

-- 

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Mike Murphy
781 Inman Mews Drive Atlanta GA 30307
Landline: 404-653-1070
Mobile: 404-545-6234
Email: mike at tyderia.net
Email Pager: pagemike at tyderia.net
AIM: mmichael453
JDAM: 33:45:14.0584N  84:21:43.038W
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00209" href="msg00209.html">[ale] Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> michael at neonym.net (Michael Mealling)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00205" href="msg00205.html">[ale] Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> PBoyington at polyengineering.com (Preston Boyington)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00207" href="msg00207.html">[ale] Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> michael at neonym.net (Michael Mealling)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00207.html">[ale] Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00209.html">[ale] Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00207.html">[ale] Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00209.html">[ale] Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00208"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00208"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>