[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Jan 27 16:09:58 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: tebhcf ng [email protected] ([email protected]) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale]OT It begins... -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Jan 27 16:09:58 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg01149.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas> <<a href="msg01127.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg01149.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale]OT It begins...</li>
Not to be argumentative, but that seems far-fetched because email addresses
are so easy to get. I know how to collect more email addresses (and relevant
data that will help make a "sale") automatically in 1 hour than I can in an
entire day of hand collecting. In order for the hand collecting to be worth
it, the ROI of the hand collected email addresses would have to be thousands
of times higher. Thousands.
Further, once this "super email collection facility" HAND collected these
extremely profitable email addresses, they would have to release the data to
other spammers (or be bent on overusing the list) for it to cause a major
problem for the email address owners.
Point: The spammers who would go as far as creating such a sweat shop would
already have the science of advertising, marketing, ROI and spamming mastered
(and thus less likely to make marketing mistakes like overusing a list).
I don't doubt that you heard a story about sweat shops full of people
harvesting emails by hand, but I also don't doubt that you have heard a story
of a sweat shop full of little people building toys for children all over the
world located to the North.
My position is that we SHOULD do what we can to minimize spam - server side.
As it is, our current archives are LESS secure than Windows.
Does anyone have a server side solution?
--
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ChangingLINKS.com">http://www.ChangingLINKS.com</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01160" href="msg01160.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01163" href="msg01163.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rb211 at tds.net (William Bagwell)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01084" href="msg01084.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01127" href="msg01127.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01149" href="msg01149.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> oloryn at benshome.net (Ben Coleman)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01151.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01153.html">[ale] [OT] LJ4 print-quality issues</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01149.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01160.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#01152"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#01152"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>