[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Jan 29 23:51:17 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: tebhcf ng [email protected] ([email protected]) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1075435694.4087.22.camel@bluetoo --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale]OT It begins... -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Jan 29 23:51:17 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <1075435694.4087.22.camel@bluetoo></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <001b01c3e465$604d14c0$0a00a8c0@atlas> <<a href="msg01342.html">[email protected]</a>> <1075435694.4087.22.camel@bluetoo></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale]OT It begins...</li>
Ok, so I don't know anything about spamming, slogging programs don't exist,
and whatever you are proposing happened happened. This time, you are
omniscient.
> How do you come to the conclusion that
> ANY of those email addys come from "slogging", or for that matter
> "blogging", "clogging", or "frogging"? ;)
>
> -Jim P.
Ok, you are so funny and l33t. Right on time!
I would ask you to show me where the email addresses came from, ask you to
prove that they did NOT come from slogging (even though I showed *how* it is
possible and offered several alternative origins), or I would ask you AGAIN
to say what you believed happened, but . . . I realized I'd be wasting my
time.
1. Whatever your assertion is about the origin of the list is correct.
2. I declare you the "winner" of whatever you wanted to win.
3. Your jokes *are* funny to some, great job?!
Oh, I *think* remember:
Aren't you the spam expert who recently threatened to "pull out their
credentials" regarding spam prevention?
Your perceived spamfighting credentials are hereby honored.
Could you do us a favor and offer a solution, please
(if not for the global spam problem, then just for our mailing list)?
This just in:
"Several folks have offered to step up and help remove email addresses from
the messages in the archives. I think that is a fantastic idea!"
There was that one expert who disagreed . . . .
Times up!
--
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ChangingLINKS.com">http://www.ChangingLINKS.com</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01347" href="msg01347.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01084" href="msg01084.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01342" href="msg01342.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> groups at ChangingLINKS.com (ChangingLINKS.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01343" href="msg01343.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01345.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01347.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01364.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01347.html">[ale]OT It begins...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#01346"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#01346"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>