[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches

[kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)]

> When I saw the subject I assumed it was a company selling patchs to
> Open Source products for a high price, which is a violation of the
> GPL and hence a copyright violation.  This was not the case.

Why would it be a violation of the GPL?  If the GPL allows one to sell products generally, wouldn't it 
similarly allow one to sell patches?

--George